소개
When choosing an 발광 다이오드 표시 스크린, have you ever been entangled in the price difference between P2 and P3?
Is the extra money really worth it? What are the differences in their display effects and applicable scenarios?
This article will reveal the answers to these questions for you and help you find the best balance between budget and needs!
목차
1. The difference between the basic parameters of P2 and P3
When choosing an LED display screen, you often hear “P2” and “P3”. In fact, it refers to the dot pitch, which is the distance between pixels. P2 is 2 mm and P3 is 3 mm.
Although the difference is 1 mm, it has a great impact on the picture quality and user experience.
The dot pitch of P2 is smaller, so more pixels can be installed per unit area, and the picture is more delicate. For example, in one square meter, P2 has about 250,000 pixels, and P3 has only 110,000.
In short, the picture of P2 looks clearer, especially when viewed at close range, and the details will not be blurred.
Suitable for 전시회, live broadcast rooms, conference rooms and other places with high requirements for picture quality.
그만큼 시거리 is also different. P2 is recommended to be viewed at more than 2 meters, and P3 is suitable for more than 3 meters.
If the screen is close to people, such as a display window or a small meeting room, P2 is more suitable. If the distance is farther, such as a shopping mall lobby, P3 is enough.
In terms of price, P2 costs more, not only the screen but also the supporting equipment and maintenance, which are relatively expensive.
P3 is more economical and suitable for scenes with limited budgets and less demanding image quality.
In general, P2 has better image quality and is suitable for close-range, high-demand occasions.
P3 has average image quality and is suitable for medium and long distances and limited budgets. The key to choosing which one is to look at your actual needs and usage environment.
2. Why is the price difference between the two obvious?
Many people are puzzled by the price difference between P2 and P3: the dot pitch is only 1 mm different, so why is the price so different?
In fact, there are many reasons behind this, mainly reflected in the three aspects of manufacturing difficulty, installation and debugging, and market supply and demand.
1). Manufacturing difficulty
Let’s talk about P2 first. Its dot pitch is small, and more lamp beads and driver chips must be installed in one square meter, almost twice the number of P3.
This is like stuffing more parts into a limited space, which is naturally much more difficult.
Moreover, the arrangement of the lamp beads must be very precise.
Even if there is a slight error, the picture may be uneven. It’s like embroidering, and no stitch can go wrong.
The requirements for circuit design, heat dissipation, signal transmission, etc., are also higher.
The production process is complicated, the yield rate is low, and the cost naturally goes up.
Let’s look at P3 again. The dot pitch is larger, the number of lamp beads and driver chips is relatively small, the arrangement is relatively loose, it is relatively easy to produce, and the cost is lower.
2). 설치 및 디버깅
The splicing of the P2 screen is very delicate, and the modules are small.
The color adjustment, 명도, calibration, and other work must be done particularly careful. This is like doing a delicate surgery, which requires a lot of manpower and time.
During on-site installation, the design of the mechanical structure must also be very particular; otherwise, it is easy to have uneven seams or uneven brightness.
The latter maintenance is also relatively complicated, and these hidden costs must be taken into account.
As for P3, the splicing is relatively simple, the module is large, the installation and debugging are easy, the requirements for mechanical structure design are not high, and the later maintenance is easy, so the hidden costs are naturally low.
3). Market supply and demand
P2 has a high technical threshold, relatively small market demand, and insufficient output.
There are a few production plants, high material procurement costs, and large-scale production is difficult to achieve. The supply and demand relationship leads to high prices.
P3 is different. It has been used for a long time, has many production plants, low material procurement costs, and large-scale production allows stable prices.
In general, the high price of P2 is not because it uses more materials, but because of the complex manufacturing process, difficult installation and debugging, and limited market size.
Therefore, when buying LED screens, don’t just focus on the dot pitch parameter and blindly pursue the minimum dot pitch.
This will not only waste money, but you may not be able to buy a product that is truly suitable for you.
3. From the display effect, what is the strength of P2?
The dot pitch of P2 is only 2 mm, and the pixel density is very high, which makes the edges of text and images on the screen particularly sharp.
You won’t see the common jaggedness or blur, especially when you look closer to the screen; this advantage is more obvious.
For example, in a conference room or a live broadcast room, the audience is relatively close.
With a P2 screen, text and icons can be clearly identified, which makes it more comfortable to watch and the information more accurately conveyed.
Compared with P3, P2’s colour performance is more delicate and rich, with a strong sense of colour layering and a natural transition. The picture looks full and not dazzling, and the graininess is much less.
Whether it is bright red or deep blue, it can be restored more realistically, which is particularly important for some occasions that need to display brand colours or exquisite pictures.
When the P2 screen plays videos and animations, the picture is smoother, without obvious mosaics or frame skipping.
The high pixel density makes the details more accurate, and the dynamic picture will not appear stiff.
In this way, even fast-paced commercials or delicate animation effects can be displayed smoothly, improving the overall viewing experience.
These advantages make P2 the first choice for many scenes with high requirements for picture quality.
Such as live broadcast background walls, 전시회 display areas, and large screens in conference rooms.
Using a P2 screen not only makes the picture more professional and the information conveyed more accurately, but also brings a better visual experience and improves the overall sense of grade.
Reduce visual fatigue and be more durable.
Because the details are richer and the colours are softer, the P2 screen does not make your eyes tired after watching for a long time.
This is especially important on occasions where you face the screen for a long time, such as command centres or exhibition halls.
The audience is comfortable watching, and the efficiency of information reception is naturally higher.
4. The usage scenario determines whether it is "worth it"
1). Meeting rooms, 전시회 halls, close-range displays – P2 is more suitable
In these occasions, the audience is usually close to the screen, such as within a few meters.
P2 has a small dot pitch, rich picture details, clear text and image edges, more accurate information transmission, and a more comfortable overall visual effect.
Especially when doing demonstrations, showing product details or showing beautiful pictures, P2 can bring obvious improvements.
2). Squares, outdoors, long-distance playback – P3 is enough
The viewing distance in these scenes is usually far, perhaps more than ten meters or even dozens of meters away.
The P3 screen with a larger dot pitch can fully meet the viewing needs, the clarity is sufficient, and the price is more affordable.
The outdoor environment has complex light, and a resolution that is too high is not easily noticeable, so P3 is more cost-effective in these places.
3). Do you really need such a high definition?
Many times, users will think “the higher the better”, but in fact, it depends on the specific needs.
For example, if the screen is mainly used to display simple text information or advertisements.
If the viewing distance is far, the high resolution of P2 may not have obvious advantages. When choosing a screen, it is most cost-effective to consider the use environment and viewing distance.
5. Cost-effectiveness analysis under budget constraints
When the budget is limited, choosing P2 or P3 often becomes a headache for many people.
Overall, P3 is more suitable for scenes that need to cover a large area but are relatively tight on funds.
Because the dot pitch of P3 is larger, the number of lamp beads and driver chips used per square meter is small, and the material cost is naturally much lower.
For example, the large screen in the shopping mall, the outdoor billboard in the square, or the background screen of a large event, P3 can use less money to make a larger display area, and the cost-effectiveness is relatively higher.
In addition, the P3 screen performs stably in the outdoor environment, has strong wind and dust resistance, and has relatively low maintenance costs. For some outdoor occasions, it is a very practical choice.
Although the resolution is not as high as P2, the picture quality is completely sufficient for long-distance viewing, and the audience will not feel blurry.
In contrast, P2 is more suitable for places with high requirements for display effects, such as conference rooms, exhibition halls, live broadcast rooms or some professional display environments for close viewing.
In these places, the details of the picture, the clarity of the text and the restoration of the colour are very critical.
Even if the budget is tight, many companies are willing to spend more money to ensure the visual experience.
After all, a clear and delicate picture can leave a more professional and high-end impression on customers.
Therefore, the core of choosing P2 or P3 is to decide according to your actual needs. If it is mainly a large-scale display and the audience is far away, P3 is a more economical and practical choice.
However, if you focus on close-range visual effects and require clear and delicate pictures, P2 is worth investing in.
In short, only by reasonably matching the budget and usage requirements can you really spend money and watch comfortably.
6. From the perspective of return on investment, is it worth spending more?
Many people will think when choosing an LED screen: Is it really cost-effective to spend more money on P2?
Can a higher-definition picture bring actual returns? In fact, it depends on your needs and goals.
First of all, a higher-definition picture can indeed enhance the audience’s visual experience.
The picture is richer in details, the colours are brighter, and the overall look is more professional, giving people a higher-end feeling.
This is very helpful in improving the brand image, especially in detail-sensitive occasions such as exhibition halls, conference rooms, and live broadcasts.
A clear and delicate screen can make customers or viewers feel that you are more attentive and more trustworthy.
Secondly, with high display quality, the conversion rate may also increase. For example, when an advertisement is played.
The picture is clear, the text and product details are clear, it is easier to attract attention, and the information is conveyed more directly, which helps to promote purchases or cooperation.
Conversely, a screen with poor picture quality may make people feel “cheap” and even affect users’ trust in products and brands.
However, the return on investment also depends on your budget and actual benefits. The cost of P2 is significantly higher than that of P3.
It is best to evaluate before buying: Can you get enough customer attention or sales increase through better display effects to make up for this part of the investment?
If the return cannot obviously cover the price difference, then the investment may not be cost-effective.
In summary, P2 screens are suitable for users who pursue high-quality visual experience, brand image, and customer conversion.
While P3 screens are still a practical and economical choice for scenes with limited budgets or low requirements for picture quality.
The key is to combine your actual needs and budget to make the most appropriate investment decision.
7. Is there a compromise solution to consider?
In fact, choosing an LED screen does not necessarily mean choosing between P2 and P3. Sometimes, a compromise solution is more practical and more cost-effective.
For example, there are many P2.5 products on the market, and the dot pitch is between P2 and P3.
It can not only ensure relatively good picture quality, but also reduce costs. It is a good compromise choice.
For example, some high-brightness and high-contrast P3 screens have improved the picture performance through technical upgrades, with brighter colours and clearer details. They can also replace P2 in many scenes.
In addition, there are some auxiliary technologies that can make up for the gap in picture quality, such as intelligent dimming, dynamic compensation, colour correction, etc.
Through software and hardware optimisation, the picture looks more uniform and comfortable, and does not appear too grainy.
More importantly, do not blindly pursue the lowest dot pitch, but make customised adjustments based on the specific venue, viewing distance and usage requirements.
For example, P2 should be used for the main display area at a close distance, and P3 or P2.5 should be used for the auxiliary screen at a farther distance, which can not only meet visual needs but also avoid unnecessary waste.
In short, the key to choosing a screen is “use it in the right place and spend the right money”.
Finding a balance point that suits your needs can achieve the best effect and input-output ratio.
8. 결론
Through the analysis of this article, I believe you have a clearer understanding of the differences, prices and applicable scenarios of P2 and P3 LED displays.
When choosing a display, the key is to match the actual needs, rather than blindly pursuing high resolution.
마지막으로 LED 디스플레이에 대해 더 알고 싶으시다면, 저희에게 연락주세요.
